1950 DKW F 89 vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (252 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 616 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 DKW F 89 | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | DKW | Renault |
Model | F 89 | Clio |
Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2540 mm |