1950 DKW F 89 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,375 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (183 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1027 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 DKW F 89 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | DKW | Toyota |
| Model | F 89 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 3375 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 183 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1887 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3270 mm |
