1950 DKW F 89 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,198 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 471 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 DKW F 89 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
Model | F 89 | Polo |
Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1331 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2470 mm |