1950 DKW F 89 vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 DKW F 89. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 DKW F 89 | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | DKW | Citroen |
Model | F 89 | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |