1950 DKW F 89 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 DKW F 89 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | F 89 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1755 mm |
