1950 Ferrari 125 F1 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ferrari 125 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ferrari 125 F1 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 329 more horse power than 1950 Ferrari 125 F1. (227 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1950 Ferrari 125 F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1950 Ferrari 125 F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Ferrari 125 F1 | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Ferrari | Cadillac |
| Model | 125 F1 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1500 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 556 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2880 mm |
