1950 Ferrari 125 F1 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ferrari 125 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ferrari 125 F1 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1950 Ferrari 125 F1. (227 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1950 Ferrari 125 F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1038 kg more than 1950 Ferrari 125 F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Ferrari 125 F1 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Ferrari | Cadillac |
| Model | 125 F1 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1500 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 227 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4788 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 2880 mm |
