1950 Ferrari 166 vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ferrari 166. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ferrari 166 would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1950 Ferrari 166. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1950 Ferrari 166. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 240 kg more than 1950 Ferrari 166. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Ferrari 166 | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Ferrari | Sunbeam |
| Model | 166 | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1140 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 27 L |
