1950 Ferrari 195 vs. 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ferrari 195. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ferrari 195 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1950 Ferrari 195. (145 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1950 Ferrari 195. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 766 kg more than 1950 Ferrari 195. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Ferrari 195 | 2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Ferrari | Jeep |
| Model | 195 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2341 cc | 3960 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 58.8 mm | 86.7 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1716 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 78 L |
