1950 Ferrari 195 vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ferrari 195. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ferrari 195 would be higher. At 2,945 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1950 Ferrari 195. (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1950 Ferrari 195. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 460 kg more than 1950 Ferrari 195. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Ferrari 195 | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Ferrari | Renault |
Model | 195 | Clio |
Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2341 cc | 2945 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.8 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 11.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1410 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 61 L |