1950 Fiat 1500 vs. 1994 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1994 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Fiat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Fiat 1500 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Volkswagen Polo (75 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1950 Fiat 1500. (47 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1950 Fiat 1500.
Because 1950 Fiat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Fiat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Fiat 1500 | 1994 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Fiat | Volkswagen |
Model | 1500 | Polo |
Year Released | 1950 | 1994 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 77.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 45 L |