1950 Fiat 1500 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Fiat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Fiat 1500 would be higher. At 2,835 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1950 Fiat 1500. (47 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1950 Fiat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Fiat 1500 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Fiat 1500 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
Model | 1500 | Colt |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1493 cc | 2835 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 100 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 95 L |