1950 Fiat 500 vs. 1954 Hudson Metropolitan
To start off, 1954 Hudson Metropolitan is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Hudson Metropolitan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Hudson Metropolitan (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1950 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Hudson Metropolitan should accelerate faster than 1950 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Hudson Metropolitan weights approximately 200 kg more than 1950 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Fiat 500 | 1954 Hudson Metropolitan | |
| Make | Fiat | Hudson |
| Model | 500 | Metropolitan |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 569 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 41 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2170 mm |
