1950 Fiat 500 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1950 Fiat 500. (16 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1950 Fiat 500.
Because 1950 Fiat 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Fiat 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Fiat 500 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | 500 | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 569 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 16 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2490 mm |
