1950 Fiat 500 vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1950 Fiat 500.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Fiat 500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1950 Fiat 500 has manual transmission. 1950 Fiat 500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Fiat 500 | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 500 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 569 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3010 mm |