1950 Fiat 500 vs. 2003 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2003 Smart ForTwo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 698 cc (3 cylinders), 2003 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Smart ForTwo (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1950 Fiat 500. (16 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1950 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Smart ForTwo weights approximately 205 kg more than 1950 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Fiat 500 | 2003 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Fiat | Smart |
Model | 500 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 569 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 16 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3250 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1290 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 33 L |