1950 Ford Consul vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ford Consul would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1950 Ford Consul. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1950 Ford Consul. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 95 kg more than 1950 Ford Consul. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Ford Consul | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
| Model | Consul | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 1506 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2190 mm |
