1950 Ford Custom vs. 1983 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1983 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ford Custom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ford Custom would be higher. At 3,917 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Ford Custom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Ford Custom (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1983 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Ford Custom should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Ford Custom | 1983 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Custom | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1950 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3917 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2620 mm |