1950 Ford Custom vs. 1989 Mazda 626
To start off, 1989 Mazda 626 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ford Custom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ford Custom would be higher. At 3,917 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Ford Custom is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1950 Ford Custom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Ford Custom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Ford Custom | 1989 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Custom | 626 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3917 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2520 mm |