1950 Ford F vs. 1973 Mazda RX-4
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-4 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ford F would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Ford F | 1973 Mazda RX-4 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F | RX-4 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1973 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1670 mm |
