1950 Ford F vs. 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ford F would be higher.
Because 1950 Ford F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Ford F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Ford F | 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | F | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1950 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |