1950 Ford F vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ford F would be higher.
Because 2003 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Ford F. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Ford F | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | F | 6 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1790 mm |