1950 Ford F vs. 2012 Mitsubishi RVR
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi RVR is newer by 62 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ford F would be higher.
Because 1950 Ford F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Ford F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi RVR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Ford F | 2012 Mitsubishi RVR | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | F | RVR |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1770 mm |
