1950 Ford Zephyr vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1950 Ford Zephyr. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1950 Ford Zephyr.
Because 1950 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Ford Zephyr | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Zephyr | Pixo |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 130 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2360 mm |