1950 GAZ M-20 vs. 1973 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1973 Triumph Stag is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Triumph Stag (124 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1950 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1950 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1973 Triumph Stag.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Triumph Stag (192 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 GAZ M-20. (126 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1973 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1950 GAZ M-20 | 1973 Triumph Stag | |
Make | GAZ | Triumph |
Model | M-20 | Stag |
Year Released | 1950 | 1973 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2550 mm |