1950 GAZ M-20 vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Smart (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1950 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1950 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 644 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 GAZ M-20 (126 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1950 GAZ M-20 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 GAZ M-20 | 2002 MCC Smart | |
| Make | GAZ | MCC |
| Model | M-20 | Smart |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2120 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 816 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2370 mm |
