1950 GAZ M-20 vs. 2004 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1950 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1950 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 345 kg more than 1950 GAZ M-20. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 285 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 GAZ M-20. (126 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1950 GAZ M-20 | 2004 Jaguar XK | |
Make | GAZ | Jaguar |
Model | M-20 | XK |
Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 294 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 411 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2590 mm |