1950 GAZ M-20 vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 2,120 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 GAZ M-20 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1950 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1950 GAZ M-20.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 GAZ M-20. (126 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 GAZ M-20. 2006 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1950 GAZ M-20 has manual transmission. 1950 GAZ M-20 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 GAZ M-20 | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | GAZ | Mazda |
| Model | M-20 | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
| Engine Size | 2120 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Torque | 126 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2710 mm |
