1950 GAZ M-20 vs. 2009 Nissan GT-R
To start off, 2009 Nissan GT-R is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 GAZ M-20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 GAZ M-20 would be higher. At 3,799 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan GT-R is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan GT-R (480 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 429 more horse power than 1950 GAZ M-20. (51 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan GT-R should accelerate faster than 1950 GAZ M-20. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 GAZ M-20 weights approximately 18 kg more than 2009 Nissan GT-R.
Because 2009 Nissan GT-R is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 GAZ M-20. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan GT-R will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan GT-R (583 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 457 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 GAZ M-20. (126 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan GT-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 GAZ M-20.
Compare all specifications:
1950 GAZ M-20 | 2009 Nissan GT-R | |
Make | GAZ | Nissan |
Model | M-20 | GT-R |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 2120 cc | 3799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 480 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 126 Nm | 583 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2790 mm |