1950 Holden FX vs. 1953 Steyr 2000
To start off, 1953 Steyr 2000 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Steyr 2000 (64 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Steyr 2000 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Steyr 2000 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 1953 Steyr 2000 | |
Make | Holden | Steyr |
Model | FX | 2000 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 64 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2660 mm |