1950 Holden FX vs. 1960 Jeep CJ5

To start off, 1960 Jeep CJ5 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Jeep CJ5 (59 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1960 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Holden FX 1960 Jeep CJ5
Make Holden Jeep
Model FX CJ5
Year Released 1950 1960
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2165 cc 2197 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 51 HP 59 HP
Torque 136 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 970 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 3520 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1580 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2060 mm