1950 Holden FX vs. 1960 MG Magnett
To start off, 1960 MG Magnett is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 MG Magnett (63 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1960 MG Magnett should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 MG Magnett weights approximately 170 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 MG Magnett. (115 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 MG Magnett.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 1960 MG Magnett | |
Make | Holden | MG |
Model | FX | Magnett |
Year Released | 1950 | 1960 |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2530 mm |