1950 Holden FX vs. 1961 Renault 4
To start off, 1961 Renault 4 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Holden FX (51 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1961 Renault 4. (33 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1961 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 320 kg more than 1961 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 1961 Renault 4 | |
Make | Holden | Renault |
Model | FX | 4 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 33 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2410 mm |