1950 Holden FX vs. 1964 Opel Rekord
To start off, 1964 Opel Rekord is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,604 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Opel Rekord (100 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Opel Rekord should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Opel Rekord weights approximately 65 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Opel Rekord (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1964 Opel Rekord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 1964 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Holden | Opel |
Model | FX | Rekord |
Year Released | 1950 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2650 mm |