1950 Holden FX vs. 1965 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1965 Lotus Elan is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Lotus Elan (104 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 310 kg more than 1965 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 1965 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | FX | Elan |
Year Released | 1950 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 104 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2140 mm |