1950 Holden FX vs. 1965 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1965 Lotus Seven is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Holden FX (51 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1965 Lotus Seven. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1965 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 540 kg more than 1965 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 1965 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Holden | Lotus |
| Model | FX | Seven |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 38 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2240 mm |
