1950 Holden FX vs. 1965 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1965 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Holden FX (51 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 470 kg more than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 1965 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Holden | Suzuki |
| Model | FX | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 18 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2060 mm |
