1950 Holden FX vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1967 Mercury Cougar is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Cougar (137 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 430 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 1967 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Holden | Mercury |
| Model | FX | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 4940 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 137 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2830 mm |
