1950 Holden FX vs. 1967 Opel Record
To start off, 1967 Opel Record is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Opel Record is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Opel Record (90 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Opel Record should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Opel Record (152 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 1967 Opel Record will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 1967 Opel Record | |
Make | Holden | Opel |
Model | FX | Record |
Year Released | 1950 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2511 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 152 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2670 mm |