1950 Holden FX vs. 1967 Steyr 650T
To start off, 1967 Steyr 650T is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Holden FX (51 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1967 Steyr 650T. (20 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1967 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 470 kg more than 1967 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Steyr 650T. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Steyr 650T.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 1967 Steyr 650T | |
Make | Holden | Steyr |
Model | FX | 650T |
Year Released | 1950 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 20 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 41 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 2970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 1850 mm |