1950 Holden FX vs. 1968 Jaguar XJ-13
To start off, 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 4,990 cc (12 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 weights approximately 155 kg more than 1950 Holden FX.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 (570 Nm @ 6300 RPM) has 434 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 1968 Jaguar XJ-13 | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | FX | XJ-13 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 4990 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 570 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1125 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1000 mm |
