1950 Holden FX vs. 1970 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1970 Nissan Cedric is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Nissan Cedric (114 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 320 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1970 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1970 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 1970 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | FX | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
