1950 Holden FX vs. 1971 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1971 Triumph 2000 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Triumph 2000 (83 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1971 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 275 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 136 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 1971 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Holden | Triumph |
| Model | FX | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 83 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
