1950 Holden FX vs. 1972 Mazda 616
To start off, 1972 Mazda 616 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda 616 (79 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 60 kg more than 1972 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 1972 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | FX | 616 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |
