1950 Holden FX vs. 1972 Mazda Chante
To start off, 1972 Mazda Chante is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Holden FX (51 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Chante. (30 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Holden FX should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Chante. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Holden FX weights approximately 480 kg more than 1972 Mazda Chante. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1950 Holden FX (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Chante. (40 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1950 Holden FX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Chante.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 1972 Mazda Chante | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | FX | Chante |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 30 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 40 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 490 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2210 mm |
