1950 Holden FX vs. 1977 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 1977 Toyota Mark II is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1950 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Toyota Mark II (106 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 225 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1977 Toyota Mark II (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1977 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 1977 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Holden | Toyota |
Model | FX | Mark II |
Year Released | 1950 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2590 mm |