1950 Holden FX vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP) has 107 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1950 Holden FX has manual transmission. 1950 Holden FX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Holden | Ford |
| Model | FX | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4690 mm |
