1950 Holden FX vs. 1984 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1984 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Holden FX | 1984 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Holden | Chevrolet |
| Model | FX | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2473 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 136 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2580 mm |
