1950 Holden FX vs. 1989 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1989 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1989 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Mazda RX-7 (200 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Mazda RX-7 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Mazda RX-7 (264 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1989 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 1989 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | FX | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 2614 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 264 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2430 mm |