1950 Holden FX vs. 1990 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJR is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR (252 HP) has 201 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 523 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Jaguar XJR (377 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 1990 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Holden FX | 1990 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Holden | Jaguar |
Model | FX | XJR |
Year Released | 1950 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 3979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 136 Nm | 377 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1493 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2880 mm |